Asset Management

Nepean Blue Mountain LHD – Asset Data and Life Cycling

Nepean Blue Mountain LHD – Asset Data and Life Cycling Slide 1
previous arrowprevious arrow
next arrownext arrow

Nepean Blue Mountain LHD – Asset Data and Life Cycling

Asset Data Capture and Life Cycle Assessment

As part of NSW Health’s implementation of Asset and Facilities Management System (AFMOnline), EPES were engaged by NBMLHD to undertake a district wide audit of maintainable assets and prepare a database of plant and equipment to enable population of data into the new system.

The scope EPES undertook was significant and hands-on:

​1. Assessment of age and condition, estimate of remaining service life

2. Assign unique Asset number

3. Collation of available technical data associated with each piece of equipment

4. Image log for each piece of equipment

Project Information

Location:  Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
Client: Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District (NBMLHD)
Engagement: Engineering Consultant
Sectors: Buildings, Hospitals and Healthcare
Services: Asset Management, Building Services, Construction and Design Consulting, Independent Reviews and Audits
Year: 2018

​5. Inspection of mechanical, electrical and hydraulic assets at Nepean Hospital, Blue Mountains Hospital, Lithgow Hospital, Portland and Springwood Hospitals

In our planning for this project, we identified a need to develop an electronic Data Collection System and developed a customised EPES Asset Management Register with VBA Microsoft Excel. This enabled EPES personnel to undertake the data collection using Tablets, avoiding double handling and simplifying reporting.  

The Problem

There were several logistical challenges associated with the works, that included:

We were also tasked with ensuring that the information we produced was coherent, organised and in a suitable format to be integrated into AFMOnline.

Analysis and Implementation

We recognised early that to compile high quality, repeatable and consistent data we needed to constrain the way the information was collected. We developed the EPES Asset Management System with limited customisable fields, and otherwise standardised data entry fields (e.g. drop-down lists & scales). This would be crucial to the quality the end-product.

We also understood that we needed to break down the communication barriers and liaise directly with on-the-ground maintenance staff who would be able to short circuit the information gathering processes. Given the significant practical experience of our technical staff, we easily build rapport with maintenance and trade staff gaining access to information and assistance in finding where assets were in the absence of as-built drawings and data. 

Finally, as consistency was fundamental, we ensured that teams working on the different sites attended regular briefings during the work with other teams to ensure alignment in the recording process, consistency in the evaluation of asset condition and assumptions used in estimating remaining service life.

Outcome

Because of the extent of planning and control, and the development of a consistent data collection system we were able to provide NBMLHD with a register of maintainable assets that was consistent across the district. It also gave them visibility of which assets were approaching the end of service life to enable budget forecasting and ARRP planning to be initiated in a proactive manner.  

Where complex tasks and challenging outcomes are required, the best investment is to plan both the outcome of the works and the method of execution. From this understanding, a robust and accelerable plan is defined.

Gosford Hospital – Operating Theatre Upgrade

Gosford Hospital – Operating Theatre Upgrade Slide 1
previous arrowprevious arrow
next arrownext arrow

Gosford Hospital - Operating Theatre Upgrade

Mechanical Engineering

EPES were engaged to undertake compliance reviews and testing of existing operating theatres precinct and baseline performance prior to opening of additional theatres. This included verification of theatre air handling systems with regards to NSW Health legacy and current (AusHFG) Engineering Services Guidelines as well as legacy and current Australian Standards.

Scope generally included:

Project Information

Location: Gosford, New South Wales, Australia
Client: Central Coast Local Health District
Engagement: Design Consultant
Sectors: Buildings, Hospitals and Healthcare
Services: Asset Management, Building Services, Commissioning Assistance, Construction and Design Consulting, Independent Reviews and Audits
Year: 2018

EPES provided recommendations and contract documentation for works to be undertaken to upgrade operating theatres precinct to maintain compliance with current AusHFG requirements. EPES provided ongoing technical support and guidance.

The Problem

Performing any works or investigations within an operating theatre precinct presents many logistical challenges in terms of access, interruptions and critical performance of air handling systems in these areas. Also, given the age of the equipment serving the existing theatres technical data was difficult to source from suppliers and manufacturers (they don’t exist anymore).

EPES have been involved in many projects where upgrade works have not considered the original design intention of existing systems. This creates expensive and disruptive problems negatively effecting system reliability and performance.

Analysis and Implementation

Communication with stakeholders is crucial to gaining the required access to critical areas such as operating theatre precincts, as well as being highly flexible with timing and short notice requirements (e.g. emergency theatre demands). 

Additionally, at EPES we have engineers who’ve had experience working with air handling systems for over 40 years. This understanding enables us an advantage in being able to trouble shoot and define system operation largely in the absence of as-built documentation and supplier technical literature. 

Outcome

EPES were able to prepare contract design documentation that supplemented the intended original operation of the system, whilst upgrading to current performance requirements.

Using experience engineers with a track record of working and modifying legacy systems is critical for successful outcomes.

Complete Form Below

Download EPES Capability Statement